Comments on: Good News for Richmond Cyclists https://averagejoecyclist.com/good-news-for-richmond-cyclists/ A Blog for Average People who LOVE to ride bikes! Tue, 27 Jun 2017 04:29:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1 By: The Buzzer blog » Links and tidbits for Fri Nov. 12 https://averagejoecyclist.com/good-news-for-richmond-cyclists/#comment-735 Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:54:06 +0000 https://averagejoecyclist.com/?p=1914#comment-735 […] has added a new bike trail that connects to the Canada Line bike and pedestrian […]

]]>
By: JoeAverage https://averagejoecyclist.com/good-news-for-richmond-cyclists/#comment-676 Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:57:14 +0000 https://averagejoecyclist.com/?p=1914#comment-676 In reply to Graeme.

Thanks for this, Graeme. It’s encouraging news. Plus, something I have in mind is to research the financial side of things – during the hysteria about Hornby, I read somewhere that the cost of the Hornby bike lane would be the same as the cost of 1 bus. Given that they are now estimating the number of cyclists coming into Vancouver daily is equivalent to something like 75 bus loads, it makes me realize that one has to look at the complete financial picture, rather than focusing on numbers in isolation. So I really want to research and see how much money is put into car infrastructure vs. bike infrastructure vs. transit, for example. I read somewhere the other day that around 10% of the USA’s transport spending goes on transit – the other 90% goes on providing roads for cars. I would guess Canada’s is similar. If you start to think what our transit system would look like if we spent 50% of the transport budget on transit, the mind boggles – perhaps 400% better than it looks now? We constantly hear that cars are essential because of urban sprawl – but with really wonderful transit and safe bike lanes, I wonder if that would still be true?

]]>
By: Graeme https://averagejoecyclist.com/good-news-for-richmond-cyclists/#comment-673 Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:27:48 +0000 https://averagejoecyclist.com/?p=1914#comment-673 In reply to Sean.

I was just looking at TransLink’s proposals for 2011 and was struck by two points in their plan:

– Retain funding for Major Road Network Improvement projects (Minor Capital Program) at $20M/year
– Preserve funding for Bike Capital Program at $6M/year

I’m not really good with financial numbers, but given the relative costs of major roadwork vs. bikes, this seems like a huge amount to be spending on the cycling side of things. (I’m not complaining at all!)

]]>
By: JoeAverage https://averagejoecyclist.com/good-news-for-richmond-cyclists/#comment-640 Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:06:44 +0000 https://averagejoecyclist.com/?p=1914#comment-640 In reply to Alex P.

Hey Alex, thanks for the link – will add it to the post.

]]>
By: Alex P https://averagejoecyclist.com/good-news-for-richmond-cyclists/#comment-634 Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:11:07 +0000 https://averagejoecyclist.com/?p=1914#comment-634 There’s a vid up now about the bridge I just noticed:

http://www.bclocalnews.com/richmond_southdelta/richmondreview/news/106995723.html

]]>
By: JoeAverage https://averagejoecyclist.com/good-news-for-richmond-cyclists/#comment-625 Tue, 09 Nov 2010 03:04:00 +0000 https://averagejoecyclist.com/?p=1914#comment-625 In reply to Sean.

I think for some people, $10 spent on cycling infrastructure would be $10 too much. On the other hand, most people don’t know or care what roads costs – as long as they have a smoothish structure on which to be gridlocked …

]]>
By: Sean https://averagejoecyclist.com/good-news-for-richmond-cyclists/#comment-624 Tue, 09 Nov 2010 02:18:30 +0000 https://averagejoecyclist.com/?p=1914#comment-624 In reply to Declan.

The downtown separated bike lanes are probably the most expensive per-km in the lower mainland with the exception of the railway overpass on the CVG at Sperling. Even so, both the Hornby and Dunsmuir lanes together cost less than the cost of putting in left turn bays at one intersection Knight Street (about 4.5 million).

Yet somehow, people still manage to complain about the cost…

]]>
By: JoeAverage https://averagejoecyclist.com/good-news-for-richmond-cyclists/#comment-619 Mon, 08 Nov 2010 07:39:51 +0000 https://averagejoecyclist.com/?p=1914#comment-619 In reply to Declan.

Great point, which I had not thought of, Declan. I should research a post about this. I read somewhere that 10% of the money for transport is spent on transit – the rest is for roads. It would be interesting to get the numbers on what is spent on roads for cars, and what is spent on cycle routes.

]]>
By: Declan https://averagejoecyclist.com/good-news-for-richmond-cyclists/#comment-618 Mon, 08 Nov 2010 07:29:17 +0000 https://averagejoecyclist.com/?p=1914#comment-618 The thing I find remarkable about bike network improvements, and which makes me cautiously optimistic for the future of the bike network in Vancouver, is how cheap they are.

$265,000? That’s pocket change in the regional/provincial scheme of things.

]]>
By: JoeAverage https://averagejoecyclist.com/good-news-for-richmond-cyclists/#comment-617 Mon, 08 Nov 2010 07:22:49 +0000 https://averagejoecyclist.com/?p=1914#comment-617 In reply to Alex P.

yes, I had not heard of it either. I look forward to trying it out.

]]>